- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Hello all-
I am an FNP student here making an attempt to better understand some recommendations I have recently received regarding neutral language and use of anatomy terminology when caring for people and discussing sexual health. My concern is that I have typically found that people are less comfortable discussing sexual issues when the professional they are working with uses colloquialisms rather than anatomical descriptions, yet it seems that the recommendations I am receiving indicate that naming a person's genitals anatomically is not acceptable or neutral language. I'm afraid that encouraging medical professionals, and the people they are there to assist, not to explicitly discuss one's full body is likely to be detrimental in the long run.
Can anyone help shed light on the issue of neutral language as it relates to anatomical terminology, and the best way to address sexual health, menstrual cycles, phenotypical development, etc from the standpoint of the LGBTQ+ community?
I am an FNP student here making an attempt to better understand some recommendations I have recently received regarding neutral language and use of anatomy terminology when caring for people and discussing sexual health. My concern is that I have typically found that people are less comfortable discussing sexual issues when the professional they are working with uses colloquialisms rather than anatomical descriptions, yet it seems that the recommendations I am receiving indicate that naming a person's genitals anatomically is not acceptable or neutral language. I'm afraid that encouraging medical professionals, and the people they are there to assist, not to explicitly discuss one's full body is likely to be detrimental in the long run.
Can anyone help shed light on the issue of neutral language as it relates to anatomical terminology, and the best way to address sexual health, menstrual cycles, phenotypical development, etc from the standpoint of the LGBTQ+ community?